The Liberal Democrats had the opportunity of a lifetime to do well and maybe even hold the balance of power in GE 2019. Their stars were aligned but they threw it all away by committing the biggest and most basic error in politics. They adopted an idea that had majority support (stopping Brexit) but they turned it into an undemocratic policy.
It didn’t matter that the polls were showing that most people would like to stop Brexit. Brexit was voted for as a binary-referendum issue. It was democratically decided (outside Scotland), and so, UK voters felt that to stop Brexit, another binary Leave/Remain choice referendum was required. Therefore, being on the wrong side of democracy hammered the Lib Dems in the election and cost their leader her seat. Being on the right side of democracy in UK politics is fundamental and you pay a heavy price for getting it wrong.
In Scotland, though there is a different democratic conundrum and the Conservatives are now on the wrong side of that. Having managed to corral the hard-line Leave and Unionist vote by campaigning on a “stop indyref2” manifesto pledge, the Conservatives are locked into saying No to The Scottish Government’s demand for the powers to hold a referendum. The problem with that is that they only won 10% of the seats with that pledge compared to the SNP, who returned 81% of Scotland MPs, on a “Scotland’s right to chose” platform.
The SNP are arguing for democracy, not for independence. They are not saying vote for us and we will make Scotland independent. The latter is something many independence supporters may have wanted to hear. However, independence was rejected in a binary Yes/No referendum and even though many promises were broken and Brexit means the Union that Scotland voted to stay part of no longer exists, the people of Scotland, as a whole, will only support overturning the 2014 result in the same democratic way, for now.
Nicola Sturgeon knows that, she knows that she can win the democratic argument and that will then make it easier to win the independence argument. That’s an argument the SNP can’t lose because every time Boris Johnson says no to the right to chose his cause loses support. Being anti-democratic is a bad look in any political season. A large scale poll of 2,032 Scottish voters by Survation for Progress Scotland (Oct 2019) found that 60% accept that there will be an independence referendum before the end of 2021. The writing is on the wall, especially when you consider that the Scottish Government is not asking for a referendum but for the power to hold one at the time of the democratically elected Scottish Parliament’s choosing. That is arguing for the gold standard in a democracy especially when 70% of Scottish voters (excluding don’t knows) believe that The Scottish parliament should control all decisions affecting people in Scotland.
If the tables were turned and Johnson had to defend a call for Scotland to declare independence without a referendum, he would enjoy popular support. Democracy is fundamental to the process, the SNP and the rest of the independence movement must always remember this. It is crucial that every opportunity to use the power of democracy to demonstrate the UK Government’s lack of care for Scotland’s democratic will is exhausted.
Johnson, however, like Swinson, believes his own press and has no advisers that truly understand the politics of Scotland. Although his populous appeal in England can’t be underestimated (Etonian foppish charm doesn’t play so well in Scotland), no one is claiming that he is a deep thinker. That has allowed the SNP to reap the benefits of being on the right side of democracy which as I pointed out a year ago was their plan all along.
Some independence supporting commentators say there is no chance of a new referendum whilst Johnson keeps saying no. However, the Scottish Government understand that there is only one winner in this scenario and checkmate is coming in in fewer moves than you might think.
Boris Johnson will be the last PM of the UK. Don’t feel sorry for him he’ll probably spin it as a victory for English independence, style himself as the founding father of an independent England and everyone will be happy.
Of course people must be allowed to change their minds if the situation has changed, and nobody can reasonably argue that the situation has not definitely changed…So even if Westminster continue to deny Scotland it’s democratic right to a 2nd independence referendum…a wee trip to the courts can only have one winner…Scotland’s sovereign people…and as Gordon alludes to in the article trying to deny Scot’s their democracy will have consequences that will undoubtably break up the Union…
Very good article of ( IMO) you would have difficulty in arguing against!
Good article, this.
I was saying to someone the other day that Johnson had won the GE down south by managing to manipulate events to look like the great democrat. If the situation relating to indyref 2 plays out as expected, he will look like the total opposite here (to many Scots at least).
The other correspondent (at the time of this posting) is relying on extremely bad faith argument that “you had your shot and you can’t change your mind. There’s no impasse here and no decision the UK ever takes can merit revisiting the question”.
But there is an impasse. The 2014 and 2016 results in Scotland are incompatible. There is a question to be asked of Scotland’s residents as to which direction they want to take now.
The party proposing as much has now won several mandates to ask this question to test what people want. It’s a big question and pretending Scots haven’t asked for incompatible things is contemptible.
It might be a No again and that’s fine. The point is to get a true picture of the constitutional priorities of the residents of Scotland.
Anyone arguing that we shouldn’t ask this is no democrat.
There’s a difference.
The UK had a referendum in 2016. Leave won. Labour and the Lib Dems were going against the result and trying to get a 2nd referendum to stop it happening. They were punished.
Scotland had a referendum in 2014. Remain won. The SNP are going against the result to make it happen.
The whole point of the article is that the Lib Dems were not trying to get a 2nd referendum to stop it happening. They had a policy of stopping Brexit without a referendum and that is what damaged them.
The SNP had a policy of stopping Brexit with a secod referednum and won 81% of the available seats. The SNP also respoct the 2014 result and although most of the promises offreed in order to win that referemdum have been broken the SNP are saying it cant be overturned without a second referendum on indepednecne. The material changce since 2014 is Brexit against the democraticaly stated wishes of the Scottish people so we are having another referendum = that’s democracy for you people get to change thier minds.